Compliance is the whole business, not a sideline
Quick turnaround
Specialists, not generalists
Transparent pricing
Your data stays yours
How we work
Most portals feed data. We advise on what it should say.
This is the whole difference, and it runs through everything we file — not only XBRL. One approach processes what you send. The other reads it first and tells you what it should say.
Your file goes in as it arrives
You upload the accounts. Software maps the balance sheet to the taxonomy, an operator clears the validation errors, and the form is submitted.
Nobody asks whether the notes are tagged to the elements that actually mean what your disclosure says. Nobody flags that a related party transaction has been mapped to a plausible-looking element that is not the right one.
The same pattern shows up beyond XBRL: a resolution that does not match the section it is filed under, a charge registered late without anyone mentioning condonation, an annual return that contradicts the register of members.
It is fast, it is cheap, and for a straightforward filing it is often fine. You find out it was not fine when the filing comes back.
A qualified professional reads it first
A Company Secretary or Chartered Accountant reads your financial statements before anything is tagged, and decides how each disclosure should be represented — because that is a matter of professional judgement, not data entry.
If something in the accounts will not sit correctly in the taxonomy, or a note is going to raise a question at the ROC, we tell you before we file, not after.
And when a filing stops being routine — a notice, a defective filing, a condonation — there are corporate lawyers in the same office who argue those matters, rather than a referral elsewhere.
The honest comparison
Where that difference actually shows up
Not a criticism of anyone. A volume platform and an advisory practice are built to do different jobs — these are the points at which you feel which one you engaged.
| FileMyXBRL | A general compliance portal | |
|---|---|---|
| What you are buying | Professional judgement on what your filing should say | Conversion of what you send |
| Who reads the accounts | A qualified CS or CA, before anything is tagged | Software, then an operator clearing validation errors |
| If something looks wrong | You hear about it before we file | Filed as received |
| Who you deal with | A named professional | A ticket number and whoever picks it up |
| When it stops being routine | Corporate lawyers in the same office — condonation, compounding, ROC and RD notices | Referred out, or not handled |
| Pricing | Published on the site — from Rs. 2,999, before you speak to anyone | Quote on request, after a form and a phone call |
| Government fees | Billed at actuals with the challan attached | Often bundled into a figure you cannot verify |
| If you file for clients | Monthly account, one consolidated invoice, work delivered unbranded under your firm’s name | Built for the end client, not for a practice filing on their behalf |
| If a query is raised | Resolved at no further cost where the mistake is ours | Usually a fresh charge |
| Before you pay | Three free tools tell you what you owe and whether XBRL even applies | An enquiry form |
When a portal is the right answer. If your filing is genuinely routine and you want everything under one login, a volume platform will do it more cheaply and we will tell you so. If it is an Ind AS consolidation, a cost audit report, or a filing that has already come back once — that is the work we do every day.
What we handle
The whole MCA file, not just the XBRL
XBRL is the work we are known for, and it is the hardest part of the year. But a company’s obligations to the Registrar run from the day it is incorporated to the day it is struck off, and we handle that whole span — including the parts that go wrong.
XBRL conversion
C&I and Ind AS taxonomies, standalone and consolidated. Tagged, validated, pre-scrutinised, and read by a qualified reviewer before it reaches you.
Annual ROC filings
The full annual cycle, with the board report drafted to Section 134 and every due date counted from your AGM rather than assumed.
Cost audit reports
A separate taxonomy and a separate exercise from AOC-4. Product group classification and the reconciliation to the audited accounts, checked before submission.
Event-based MCA forms
Appointments, allotments, charges, capital changes. Resolutions and attachments drafted for you, not requested from you.
Ongoing MCA compliance
Due-date tracking across everything you owe, share certificates issued and stamped, statutory registers maintained, meetings supported, and a named contact rather than a ticket queue.
Incorporation
Name approval, DSC and DIN end to end, MOA and AOA drafted for the business you actually intend to run — then the compliance calendar set up from day one.
Our Expertise

Our Expertise

Who actually does your filing
Four disciplines, not one queue
Twenty people work on MCA and XBRL compliance here full time — not a department inside a larger practice, and not a single queue. Work is divided by discipline, so a taxonomy question reaches someone who maps instance documents every day, and a show cause notice reaches someone who argues them.
Company Secretaries
Annual ROC filings, board and general meeting compliance, and the statutory record behind them.
- AOC-4, MGT-7 and MGT-7A
- ADT-1, DIR-12, PAS-3, SH-7
- Registers, minutes and resolutions
Chartered Accountants
Review of the financial statements before conversion, and mapping every line to the right MCA taxonomy.
- C&I and Ind AS taxonomies
- Cost audit reports in XBRL
- Notes, schedules and disclosures
Corporate lawyers
The matters that stop being routine — where a filing is late, defective, or has already attracted a notice.
- Condonation and compounding
- Notices from the ROC and RD
- Director disqualification
Compliance analysts
The execution layer: tagging, validation, chasing documents, and keeping every date visible before it costs you.
- XBRL tagging and validation
- Due-date tracking and reminders
- Document collection and checking
What we are good at
Two things decide whether a filing goes in clean: whether the person doing the tagging actually understands the taxonomy, and whether anyone told you what was due before the deadline arrived.
Taxonomy judgement. Most XBRL errors are not arithmetic — they are a note tagged to a plausible-looking element that is not the right one. That is caught by a reviewer who has seen the same disclosure fifty times, not by software.
Deadlines surfaced early. Every client on a compliance retainer has their due dates tracked from the day we take the file on, and hears from us before the date, not after the additional fee has started running.
Why we give the answer away
You should know where you stand before you pay anyone. Including us.
Most firms in this market keep the answer behind an enquiry form, because the uncertainty is what gets you on the phone. We publish our rates and we built three tools that tell you your position in under a minute — no sign-up, no email, no obligation. If the answer is that you do not need us this year, that is a perfectly good outcome.
Is XBRL applicable to my company?
Four questions on listing status, capital, turnover and accounting standard. Tells you whether AOC-4 XBRL is mandatory, and which taxonomy you would file under.
Check applicability →Takes 30 secondsROC due dates and late fees
Enter your year end and AGM date. See every deadline you owe, and exactly what you already owe in additional fees at Rs. 100 per day.
Calculate my dates →Takes 1 minuteMy compliance calendar
Tell it what you are — company, OPC, Section 8 or LLP — and it lays out every MCA filing you owe this year and what it costs to miss each one.
Build my calendar →The reasoning is simple. A client who understands their own position is easier to work with, argues less about the invoice, and comes back next year. We would rather earn the work from someone who already knows what it involves.

